In a speech delivered to the Women’s
Service League by Virginia Woolf, a novelist and critic who has provided
psychological insight through her works in the past, she speaks to the group
with the intention of convincing members to share their experiences regarding
joining new fields of works that were exclusive to men. By sharing their experiences,
she hopes that it would aid in gradually destroying mental obstacles that women
face constantly since many would soon begin to assist each other in getting
through what may become common struggles among them. Through this method, she
wants women to find more comfort in their chosen places in society and less
tentativeness, and she starts off the idea with experiences of her own as a
woman writer.
With
the objective to persuade, Woolf starts off the speech by discrediting herself
as a completely reliable source for a look into the struggles of women. In the
very first paragraph, she states, “My profession is literature; and in that
profession there are fewer experiences for women than in any other, with the
exception of the stage--fewer, I mean, that are peculiar to women. For the road
was cut many years ago--by Fanny Burney by Aphra Behn, by Harriet Martineau, by
Jane Austen, by George Eliot--many famous women, and many more unknown and
forgotten, have been before me, making the path smooth, and regulating my
steps. Thus, when I came to write, there were very few material obstacles in my
way” (Woolf 525). By getting this point across and establishing it in the very
beginning, Woolf uses the organization of her text that way in order to return
to this point later in her speech. If she is able to make the audience believe
that her profession is a more lenient one towards women, then she is able to
more properly convince them when she asks them to try comparing her supposedly easygoing
field of work to the more underdeveloped fields in which women are just
starting to get a feel for things within.
Woolf
also alludes to a poem by Coventry Patmore called “The Angel in the House” in
order to bring the concept of an idea into perspective for those who may not
understand. The poem itself speaks about the ideal image of a woman in the form
of the Angel, and Woolf uses Her in the form of her first experience. While
writing a review, she claims to have been haunted by a phantom, the Angel, and
in order to escape Her whispers of being an ideal and pure, Woolf kills her. “Had
I not killed her,” Woolf insisted, “she would have killed me. She would have
plucked the heart out of my writing. For, as I found, directly I put pen to
paper, you cannot review even a novel without having a mind of your own” (Woolf
526). The Angel, also being a symbol for the traditional expectations of women,
is the first obstacle Woolf revealed to have hopefully overcome in her career.
Her allusion helps the audience understand the situation she speaks of, being
pressed down by gender roles, much more easily, and they can more quickly
relate as, during their time, it was only more recent in their perspective that
women were starting to be allowed in all fields of work. This would help coax
other women into sharing their experiences as well if they have a sense of
familiarity in the community and can believe that their knowledge will also be relatable
as well as useful among their group.
Finally,
Woolf uses parallelism between the experiences of men and women while writing
to further her point. While this second professional experience becomes more
specific to writers, it still carries the overall idea she tries to convey. She
confesses that a writer’s “chief desire is to be as unconscious as possible”. She
describes that ideal state of mind, but the only pronoun used in the
description consists of “He”. She then moves on to acknowledge that, feigning a
hypothesis that ‘she’ could be interchangeable with ‘he’ in that description
since all writers are supposedly the same, but instead she asks the audience to
imagine a girl writing in that unconscious-like state. “Now came the experience,
the experience that I believe to be far commoner with women writers than with
men,” Woolf explained, “The line had raced through the girl’s fingers. Her
imagination had rushed away… And then there was a smash. There was an
explosion. There was a foam of confusion. The imagination had dashed itself
against something hard. The girl was roused from her dream” (Woolf 527-528).
This use of contrasting the girl’s erratic writing process with the much smoother
writing process of the man, Woolf is able to emphasize the extent to which a
man’s expectation, the later explained dashing against the rock, inhibits the
abilities of women. With this emphasis, Woolf can show that she knows what it
is like to be stopped from expressing oneself based on what outside influences
may think, the outside influence in this case being men, and is able to
possibly evoke a sense of empathy in her audience who would most likely know
what it is like being in that position. The mutual understanding helps to
possibly achieve Woolf’s goal in convincing her audience to begin sharing their
experiences with one another in order to solve these issues collectively as a
whole and overcome them together.
Overall,
by using these different devices, it would seem highly likely for Woolf to have
garnered the desired effect with her audience, and I feel as though she was
very clever in expressing her ideas and intentions through her speech.
No comments:
Post a Comment